If this is indeed the work of a randomizer, it's explicable.

[ The phrasing pretty clearly shows that he isn't fully convinced it is. ]

For an explanation I can only assume that we are indeed to represent the unaware public - in that event they likely have a qualified group of paleontologists among their ranks at InGen already and don't deem any more opinions necessary.

However, getting neutral but professional feedback on a project is in any case valuable...

[ He'd like to see someone professional and unassociated to InGen here for sure, because talking things over with someone like that from their perspective might give good insight on this park. ]

InGen aside, I personally would still like to hear the opinion of someone knowledgeable on this.